The Need for Organisational Resilience - Chapter 1
possible source of error, yet flexibility relies on fostering that same cognition to develop new
solutions. At times, an ‘autopilot’, rule-based, way of working suffices to counter the effects
of coupling, but in the face of complex interactions, mindfulness must be allowed to flourish.
It is understandable that a rapid transition from consistency-based to flexibility-based
management, and vice-versa, is challenging, as managers tend habitually to pursue their
chosen way of thinking and working, until external circumstances force them to change. It is
well-established that managers find it equally demanding to be simultaneously compliant
with rules, processes and routines, while deviating from them in order to permit creative
solutions to take effect. The literature offers solutions to these two problems which require
fundamentally different approaches, setting up a tension which is not easily reconcilable. In a
nuclear power plant, for example, where resilience is of utmost importance, this problem is
close to insurmountable:
We cycled endlessly through the problem of insuring rapid, unquestioning response
to orders from on high (or orders in the procedures manual), and at the same time
allowing discretion to operators. Regarding discretion, the operators would have the
latitude to make unique diagnosis of the problem and disregard the manual, and be
free of orders from remote authorities who did not have hands-on daily experience
with the system. We could recognize the need for both; we could not find a way to
have both.” (Perrow 1999, 335)
The need for resilience in 1940. From the outset, the campaign in the west in
1940 was more demanding for the Germans than it was for the French and their Allies. The
positions along the river Meuse at the southern edge of the Ardennes were not as strongly
fortified as those sections further to the East. However, the Ardennes, both the rivers Meuse
and Semois and the heights overlooking the area around Sedan, posed an additional
obstacle for the Germans. In this line, two potent French armies were deployed: the French
Second Army under General Charles Huntzinger and the French Ninth Army under General
André Georges Corap. The aim of these two armies was to establish a defence line in depth,
and repulse any German attempt to cross the rivers Semois and Meuse. In addition, the
purpose of the Ninth Army was to serve as a hinge for the more eastern armies to move into
Belgium to cover the Dyle river and reinforce the military forces of the Low-Countries to
make a stand at the city of Breda.
The Germans had to carry out a range of amphibious crossings such as over the Albert-
Canal and the rivers Semois and Meuse. Amphibious crossings take time and they require a
8 | P a g e
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online